Is linear.app optimized for AI search engines?

On AICite's 13-signal audit, linear.app scored 69/100 (grade C) — partly ready, real gaps. Great SEO fundamentals, no AI-specific files.

Does linear.app have an llms.txt file?

As of the 2026-08-26 audit, linear.app does not ship the AI-specific files AICite checks for. Run a live audit to see the current state — sites update their configuration over time.

How is the linear.app AI-search grade calculated?

AICite grades every site on the same 13 signals AI answer engines use to decide who to cite: llms.txt, llms-full.txt, robots.txt policy for AI crawlers, sitemap.xml, canonical tags, meta description, OpenGraph, JSON-LD structured data (Organization, WebSite, Article/FAQ), title length, HTTPS, and html lang. Weighted 0–100, then mapped to an A–F grade.

Is linear.app ready for AI search? Grade C (69/100)

What the grade means

This site does the traditional things well — titles, meta descriptions, canonical tags — but hasn't shipped the files AI answer engines increasingly look for. No llms.txt, thin or partial JSON-LD, and no explicit policy telling GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot how to treat the content. That's the difference between being crawlable and being cited.

Our one-line read on linear.app: Great SEO fundamentals, no AI-specific files.

The 13 signals we check

Every site — including linear.app — is graded against the same deterministic rubric. These are the signals AI answer engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews) use to decide who to fetch, trust, and cite:

llms.txt discovery file weight 20
llms-full.txt full corpus weight 8
robots.txt + explicit AI-crawler policy weight 8
Sitemap referenced from robots.txt weight 6
Canonical <link> tag weight 6
Meta description weight 6
OpenGraph (og:title, og:type, og:image) weight 5
JSON-LD present weight 8
Organization / WebSite schema weight 8
Article / FAQ / Product / HowTo schema weight 8
<title> of reasonable length weight 4
HTTPS served correctly weight 4
<html lang> declared weight 3

See linear.app's live audit

How linear.app compares

Scoring higher than linear.app: shopify.com (B, 77) , netlify.com (B, 77) , stripe.com (B, 77) .

Scoring lower than linear.app: github.com (C, 68) , notion.so (C, 66) , slack.com (C, 66) .

See the full ranking of all 25 sites on the State of AI-search 2026 leaderboard →

If this were your site, here's where to start

Ship an llms.txt. The single highest-weighted signal. A short Markdown file at /llms.txt that lists your most important pages. Full guide →
Add an AI-crawler policy to robots.txt. Explicit rules for GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, and Google-Extended. Copy-paste rules →
Ship Organization JSON-LD. So answer engines attribute mentions of your brand correctly. Template →
Verify discovery. Confirm your sitemap.xml is referenced from robots.txt. How →

FAQ

Is this grade official or endorsed by linear.app?

No. AICite is an independent tool. This grade is generated by our automated 13-signal audit of linear.app's public homepage and is not affiliated with or endorsed by linear.app. It reflects a snapshot captured on 2026-08-26.

Why might linear.app's grade change if I run it again?

Sites update their configuration. If linear.app ships an llms.txt, adds an AI-crawler robots policy, or expands its structured data, the score rises. Our captured grade is a point-in-time snapshot; the live audit always reflects the current state.

How do I improve my own site's AI-search grade?

Run the free AICite audit on your URL. It lists exactly which of the 13 signals you pass and fail, with copy-paste fixes. The $24 Pro Report bundles ready-to-ship llms.txt, robots.txt patch, and JSON-LD snippets.

Grades captured 2026-08-26 using the same 13-signal rubric AICite applies to every free audit. Want the full picture? See the 2026 leaderboard or grade your own site free.